Minnesota’s Immigration Crisis: Local Sanctuary Cities Are the Real Problem

Former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty stated that Minnesota’s dispute over federal immigration enforcement stems less from state policy than city-level decisions, identifying local jurisdictions—including Minneapolis—as the “real problem.”

In a recent interview, Pawlenty addressed concerns raised by Democratic Governor Tim Walz about escalating tensions. Walz had previously referenced Fort Sumter during an interview with The Atlantic, questioning whether Minnesota’s situation could mirror Civil War-era divisions.

Pawlenty described Tom Homan’s efforts as “a good faith gesture” aimed at de-escalation following two fatal shootings during a federal immigration surge. He noted both sides must “climb down the ladder a rung or two.”

President Donald Trump appointed Homan to lead immigration enforcement in Minnesota with the goal of adjusting operations to “de-escalate.”

Minnesota’s Department of Corrections confirmed it honors all ICE detainers and coordinates releases when individuals are in state custody. However, Minneapolis cites its separation ordinance, stating city departments—including police—do not participate in federal civil immigration enforcement.

Pawlenty argued that any reduction in federal operations would still require local cooperation, saying: “If ICE did reduce its footprint and bring in a small operational set, say, five people to catch a bad person and a known criminal, they do need perimeter protection.”

He posed the critical question: “So if you’re going to stand down the larger force from ICE, will the locals cooperate at least as to keeping the protesters at a safe distance so they’re not interfering with the operation and endangering ICE officers and the protesters themselves?”

Pawlenty emphasized that while Minnesota is not a sanctuary state at the federal level, Minneapolis and other local jurisdictions are undermining federal efforts through their lack of cooperation.